DrayTek UK Users' Community Forum
Help, Advice and Solutions from DrayTek Users
Multiple LAN2LAN VPN between same LANs
- maddriver
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Banned
Less
More
- Posts: 15
- Thank you received: 0
15 May 2013 10:32 #76197
by maddriver
Multiple LAN2LAN VPN between same LANs was created by maddriver
Background: We currently have a LAN2LAN VPN between 2 Draytek 2820's, however the connection goes up and down like an up and downy thing. I've just discovered the remote location (actually our head office where the servers are) has a second internet connection. I'm hoping I can set up a second LAN2LAN VPN to the Netgear router on the other connection, with the intention of leaving it disconnected and connecting when the primary vpn is down.
Here's the question: If I were to leave both connections up as always on would the router route through whichever is up/ most efficient, or would it just confuse everything? Is the fault tolerance worth it or should I just manually dial the alternate connection when I need it?
NOTE: I may yet connect the WAN2 of the remote 2820 to the Netgear on the second and run both VPN's on the Drayteks. This will depend on whether I can set up a VLAN on the Netgear, else WAN2 will be on the LAN subnet and will fail to route. This would be the easiest way as the server we use points at the Draytek for default gateway.
Here's the question: If I were to leave both connections up as always on would the router route through whichever is up/ most efficient, or would it just confuse everything? Is the fault tolerance worth it or should I just manually dial the alternate connection when I need it?
NOTE: I may yet connect the WAN2 of the remote 2820 to the Netgear on the second and run both VPN's on the Drayteks. This will depend on whether I can set up a VLAN on the Netgear, else WAN2 will be on the LAN subnet and will fail to route. This would be the easiest way as the server we use points at the Draytek for default gateway.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- sicon
- Offline
- Contributor
Less
More
- Posts: 642
- Thank you received: 0
15 May 2013 12:43 #76199
by sicon
Replied by sicon on topic Re: Multiple LAN2LAN VPN between same LANs
I am not sure if the 2830 will load balance a VPN but if that was me I would have a 2930 of similar that can handle VPN load balancing and create a GRE IPSEC trunk
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- maddriver
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Banned
Less
More
- Posts: 15
- Thank you received: 0
16 May 2013 17:22 #76229
by maddriver
Replied by maddriver on topic Re: Multiple LAN2LAN VPN between same LANs
OK, I'm more interested in failover so I can manually dial when needed.
Follow-up question, can the 2820 accept a VPN connection on a LAN port? I have the second router set up to port forward VPN connections to the LAN address of the 2820, but can't see in the log anything is being received. I'm waiting till I can take the main VPN down so I can test this.
Alternatively can the 2820 accept an IP address on the WAN2 port that is in the LAN subnet? My plan B is connect the WAN2 to a LAN port on the other router to use as if its a second Internet connection, but the other router is on the same subnet and doesn't do VLANs.
Follow-up question, can the 2820 accept a VPN connection on a LAN port? I have the second router set up to port forward VPN connections to the LAN address of the 2820, but can't see in the log anything is being received. I'm waiting till I can take the main VPN down so I can test this.
Alternatively can the 2820 accept an IP address on the WAN2 port that is in the LAN subnet? My plan B is connect the WAN2 to a LAN port on the other router to use as if its a second Internet connection, but the other router is on the same subnet and doesn't do VLANs.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- maddriver
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Banned
Less
More
- Posts: 15
- Thank you received: 0
17 May 2013 08:59 #76231
by maddriver
Replied by maddriver on topic Re: Multiple LAN2LAN VPN between same LANs
Update:
Netgear router log says it has received traffic that matches the VPN rule, said rule tells it to pass through to the LAN address of the 2820.
Log on the 2820 (accessed via telnet log -wt, flushed then attempted to connect) shows nothing.
I may try to reverse the dial-in /dial-out and see if they can connect that way round.
Netgear router log says it has received traffic that matches the VPN rule, said rule tells it to pass through to the LAN address of the 2820.
Log on the 2820 (accessed via telnet log -wt, flushed then attempted to connect) shows nothing.
I may try to reverse the dial-in /dial-out and see if they can connect that way round.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Moderators: Chris, Sami
Copyright © 2024 DrayTek