DrayTek UK Users' Community Forum
Help, Advice and Solutions from DrayTek Users
Max number of wireless clients ? Vigor 2820
- o0timbo0o
- Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
Less
More
- Posts: 2
- Thank you received: 0
03 Nov 2011 12:14 #69915
by o0timbo0o
Max number of wireless clients ? Vigor 2820 was created by o0timbo0o
what is the maximum number of 802.11B wireless clients that can connect to the 2820 ?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- briain
- Offline
- Junior Member
Less
More
- Posts: 80
- Thank you received: 0
17 Nov 2011 14:05 #70122
by briain
Replied by briain on topic Re: Max number of wireless clients ? Vigor 2820
Hi
I don't think there's any numerical upper limit designed into 802.11 standard as such, but there would come a point where too many clients would start to congest things. Taking things to the extreme (for the sake of this 'thought experiment) with a massive quantity of clients, even just all the handshaking activities will start to count as a significant quantity of traffic over what is a limited sized pipe (the data carrying capacity of the wireless channel; more on that down a bit). Back in the real world, there will be a balance where you'd have to assume some will be sleeping, some will be handshaking and some will be sending/receiving traffic, so that (and what the people are using the wireless for) would govern how many the link can realistically deal with.
My information on capacity is that when you consider the overheads of 802.11g wireless encapsulation, the actual data carrying capacity of a 54 Mbit/s 802.11g link will be nearer to 34 Mbit/s (or thereby) of Ethernet traffic (it depends on what's in the 802.11 packets; lots of smaller ones are worst case as each still has the overheads of the encapsulation). If there are 11b clients in the area, this situation becomes worse as the capacity drops even further due to the requirement of the system to add protection (so 11b clients don't try to send data whilst 11g clients are doing so). From memory, I think the worst case scenario could take that 34 Mbit/s for the 11g traffic down to half that capacity. Bearing all the above in mind, the size of the pipe is a lot smaller than you think and could thus be congested relatively quickly. Of course, I'm politely ignoring 11n as I've not fully read up on it yet! The other reason is that in the real world, most clients will still be 11g and thus that's the bottleneck that should be considered.
Of course, the other limit would be how many IP addresses the Draytek can issue to them, so that depends on your address range and also the Draytek's DHCP server capabilities.
Bri
PS Please excuse any typos, but I'm using one of these new-fangled iPad things!
I don't think there's any numerical upper limit designed into 802.11 standard as such, but there would come a point where too many clients would start to congest things. Taking things to the extreme (for the sake of this 'thought experiment) with a massive quantity of clients, even just all the handshaking activities will start to count as a significant quantity of traffic over what is a limited sized pipe (the data carrying capacity of the wireless channel; more on that down a bit). Back in the real world, there will be a balance where you'd have to assume some will be sleeping, some will be handshaking and some will be sending/receiving traffic, so that (and what the people are using the wireless for) would govern how many the link can realistically deal with.
My information on capacity is that when you consider the overheads of 802.11g wireless encapsulation, the actual data carrying capacity of a 54 Mbit/s 802.11g link will be nearer to 34 Mbit/s (or thereby) of Ethernet traffic (it depends on what's in the 802.11 packets; lots of smaller ones are worst case as each still has the overheads of the encapsulation). If there are 11b clients in the area, this situation becomes worse as the capacity drops even further due to the requirement of the system to add protection (so 11b clients don't try to send data whilst 11g clients are doing so). From memory, I think the worst case scenario could take that 34 Mbit/s for the 11g traffic down to half that capacity. Bearing all the above in mind, the size of the pipe is a lot smaller than you think and could thus be congested relatively quickly. Of course, I'm politely ignoring 11n as I've not fully read up on it yet! The other reason is that in the real world, most clients will still be 11g and thus that's the bottleneck that should be considered.
Of course, the other limit would be how many IP addresses the Draytek can issue to them, so that depends on your address range and also the Draytek's DHCP server capabilities.
Bri
PS Please excuse any typos, but I'm using one of these new-fangled iPad things!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- o0timbo0o
- Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
Less
More
- Posts: 2
- Thank you received: 0
17 Nov 2011 14:18 #70123
by o0timbo0o
Replied by o0timbo0o on topic Re: Max number of wireless clients ? Vigor 2820
Hi ,
I've come across a few older style routers that would only allow 16 wifi connections. There is nothing mentioned on any literature i can see .
I've got to connect 60 x 802.11b devices + a bunch of G/N. Data throughput is not a huge issue .. more the allowing of these connections to register. Was just wondering if the current Vigor we have will allow that many.
I've come across a few older style routers that would only allow 16 wifi connections. There is nothing mentioned on any literature i can see .
I've got to connect 60 x 802.11b devices + a bunch of G/N. Data throughput is not a huge issue .. more the allowing of these connections to register. Was just wondering if the current Vigor we have will allow that many.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- briain
- Offline
- Junior Member
Less
More
- Posts: 80
- Thank you received: 0
17 Nov 2011 14:20 #70124
by briain
Replied by briain on topic Re: Max number of wireless clients ? Vigor 2820
Hi
Well I'm certainly not aware of any ceiling in the Draytek firmware, but I'm certainly not one of the Draytek experts (and I use a Cisco 1252 WAP as opposed to the Draytek internal one) but I'd expect it to cope with that. To be honest, if you're that reliant on wireless, you might be a lot better with a proper WAP as if nothing else, you can then mount it somewhere that will give you optimal radio coverage (particularly if you get one that handles power over Ethernet as that saves being constrained by the location of mains sockets). If it's a large building, you could even use it far away from but in addition to the Draytek's internal one (using the same ssid but a different channel) to give you a greater coverage area and also split the cliens over both devices (assuming they're suitably scattered throughout the building). Remember that there are only three non-overlapping channels if you do that (so use only 1, 6 or 11)
Bri
PS I've just noticed that the above question was your first post, so welcome to the Draytek forum!!
Well I'm certainly not aware of any ceiling in the Draytek firmware, but I'm certainly not one of the Draytek experts (and I use a Cisco 1252 WAP as opposed to the Draytek internal one) but I'd expect it to cope with that. To be honest, if you're that reliant on wireless, you might be a lot better with a proper WAP as if nothing else, you can then mount it somewhere that will give you optimal radio coverage (particularly if you get one that handles power over Ethernet as that saves being constrained by the location of mains sockets). If it's a large building, you could even use it far away from but in addition to the Draytek's internal one (using the same ssid but a different channel) to give you a greater coverage area and also split the cliens over both devices (assuming they're suitably scattered throughout the building). Remember that there are only three non-overlapping channels if you do that (so use only 1, 6 or 11)
Bri
PS I've just noticed that the above question was your first post, so welcome to the Draytek forum!!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Moderators: Chris, Sami
Copyright © 2024 DrayTek